"Don't Go Chasing Waterfalls"

2 Samuel 11; 12: 1-24

"Don't go chasing waterfalls
Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you're used to
I know that you're gonna have it your way or nothing at all
But I think you're moving too fast"

I tell you, as the bible and "Relationships" in the bible go, it has been a couple of very exciting and even exhilarating weeks for me. Surely you all know that I had riotous good time with Jonathan and David. I think I've been scratching like a dog with fleas to talk about that untold and conveniently ignored love affair between those two men. As such, I may have gotten a little carried away. But, hey, "Truth crushed to the earth, shall rise again." Okay, moving right along.

Our next "Relationship" encounter is that between David and Bathsheba. And yes, that is the chorus to another song at the beginning of this post, but I warned you early on that I believe the sacred is secular and the secular is sacred! So ya'll g'on need to get your mind around this thang. Now, make no mistake, I do not believe this particular relationship was one of mutual consent. By biblical accounts, we know very little about the historical lives of women in near Eastern culture. What we have been able to glean from scriptural texts and commentaries, however, is that women were controlled by the men of their family. In the texts, they are often times referenced only as, "a certain woman," or either one man's daughter or another man's wife - and without being one or the other, their status, safety and security was precariously vulnerable and subject to abuse and exploitation. But something happens throughout 1 and 2 Samuel that baffles my mind. David puts a whole new spin on "You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor," that calls into question whether or not women were safe at all, even by virtue of being one man's daughter or another man's wife (NRSV 20:17). And of course the woman, Bathsheba, has no say in the matter. Let's begin shall we?

Shortly after we are first introduced to David, we see a man who is gifted more than his share from men and women alike. "Everybody loves David!" Jonathan gets naked and abdicates the throne for him - no, I'm sorry, he hands the throne over to him. And, I believe Saul would have done that and much more, if he had found favor in David's eyes as Jonathan obviously did. Yes, that is mere speculation on my part - there is no factual or biblical basis for that statement, just the wanderings of what some might call an "over-active imagination." Okay, alright... Don't go getting your panties in a wad over it. Back to the narrative.

Now, where was I? Oh, yeah, after paying a rather hefty, and might I add, a nasty and bloody dowry of 200 foreskins (100 more than required) of those uncircumcised Philistines, Saul gives his daughter, Michal to David to marry. Michal, like her brother Jonathan, loved David and she also defied her father to help David escape. After which, David goes about his business warring with anybody and everybody that got in his way. As a consequence of his adventures on the run and successes in battles, he acquires the wives of the defeated, as well as Abigail, the wife of Nabal, who died of a sudden and obvious, massive heart attack after she told him that she had gone behind his back and showed David some kindness he had previously refused to (1 Samuel 25: 2-42). Another wife picked up along the way was Ahinoam. Who pretell is Ahinoam? Hmmm.... Verr-ry in-terr-resting question!

The only other reference or mention of Ahinoam is in 1 Samuel 14:50. Drum roll please.... "And the name of Saul's wife was Ahinoam, the daughter of Ahimaaz." Umph, umph, umph.... So, now David has three wives - Michal (Saul's daughter), Abigail (Nabal's wife) and Ahinoam (Saul's wife). Now if you've being paying attention - and I know you have - then you know by virtue of them being David's wives, he now has two more reasons that validate his claim to the the throne. Uh oh, but wait a minute now! Sumptn' just happened... If Ahinoam is Saul's wife and Michal is Saul's daughter, hasn't somebody [David] uncovered somebodies [Ahinoam's and Michal's] "nakedness?" The evidence presented states, "Now the sons of Saul were Jonathan, and Ishvi, and Malchishua: and the names of his two daughters were these; the name of the first-born was Merab, and the name of the younger Michal: And the name of Saul's wife was Ahinoam" (1 Samuel 14: 49, 50a). In honor of my attorney friends out there, may it please the court, "You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter... For [she is] her near kinswoman: it is wickedness " (Leviticus 18: 17a and c). I suppose David gets a pass on that - or does he? Put a pin there. What he does do is continue collecting "more concubines and wives" (2 Samuel 5:13).

Clearly David cares nothing about "uncovering the nakedness" of anybody. Whatever king David wants, king David gets. So, when he observes Bathsheba taking a bath from his rooftop and "inquires" about her, I can't for the life of me understand why. After all, when he is told that; 1) "'This is Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam [son of Ahithophel, one of David's advisers] and, 2) the wife of Uriah the Hittite,'" he doesn't seem to care one damn bit. Instead, he sends messengers to "fetch her, and she came to him, and he lay with her... Then she returned to her house. The woman conceived; and she sent and told David, 'I am with child'" (2 Samuel 11: 2-5). Once again, what happened to, "You shall not covet your neighbor's wife?" Furthermore, what right did she have to decline his summons? None. What right did she have to deny, or say 'no?' None. Her body was not her own. But, if that wasn't enough, he takes it a step further! After learning Bathsheba is with child, David tries to cover up the misdeed by sending for her husband - Uriah, who was off at war, fighting valiantly for his king (little k) - so that he may, "Go down to thy house, and wash thy feet" (v. 8a). ;) ;) Funny thing, Uriah doesn't go to his house, instead, he sleeps at the door of the king's house. Upon hearing this David, tries a different approach by getting Uriah drunk the following night. But again, Uriah, a loyal soldier til the end, sleeps outside with the rest of David's soldiers, servants, and the Ark of the Covenant. What happens next could only be rivaled by a Shakespearean tragedy. David sends a letter by Uriah to be delivered to Joab, the head of the army, instructing him to, "Set Uriah in the forefront of the hardest fighting, and then draw back from him, so that he may be struck down and die" (vv. 8-15). What! Say it ain't so! Well, it is. And so it was, Uriah was killed, Bathsheba mourned her husband, David takes her to be his wife and with his misdeeds, adultery and murder all neatly covered up - they lived happily ever after. Or did they? Where's that pin? Take it out, because God is pissed. Too strong? I'm sorry, S/HE is "displeased."

"Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: I anointed you king over Israel, and I rescued you from the hand of Saul; I gave you your master's house, and your master's wives into your bosom, and gave you the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would have added as much more... You have struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and have taken his wife to be your wife... Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house... Thus says the LORD; I will raise up trouble against you from within your own house; and I will take your wives before your eyes, and give them to your neighbor and he shall lie with your wives before this very sun. For you did it secretly; but I will do this thing before all of Israel and before the sun" (12: 7b-12).

The Word of God, for the people of God - Thanks be to God. ;-)

"Don't go chasing waterfalls
Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you're used to
I know that you're gonna have it your way or nothing at all
But I think you're moving too fast"
© Dorinda G. Henry, 2010

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

"Everybody Loved David... But David Loved Jonathan"

Jonathan and David - Part II
1 Samuel 19: 1-7; 20: 30, 41, 42; 2 Samuel 1:23, 26, 27

Did you miss me? I missed you!

Honestly, I tell you, this narrative about Jonathan and David is so in your face that I've had a very difficult time taking the time to write about it. I can't for the life of me understand how anyone, especially these "jump up" preachers - who will read a contemporary western understanding of homosexuality into ancient Near Eastern culture and texts, that require a major stretch in associating the text to present day understandings of sexuality - justify ignoring this same-sex love story. And, if I may be so bold to suggest that there is arguably significant evidence that point toward a marriage between these two men. I mean, really, they make all this noise about there not being anything in scripture regarding homosexuality, except for those texts previously touched upon in early posts. Each of them have been misrepresented and misinterpreted, knowingly and unknowingly, as examples of God's condemnation of homosexuality and those who are homosexual, bisexual or just plain ole free with their expression of their sexuality. But how do they explain away, "Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman, do not I know that thou has chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother's nakedness" (King James 1 Samuel 20:30)? They don't! They just ignore it. Not only is Saul calling his son, Jonathan, a SON OF A B^%@H, but he is clearly identifying something else when he continues with, "do not I know that thou has chosen the son of Jesse [David] to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother's nakedness." Are you still playing naive? Alrighty then, let's go.

Last week I referenced 1 Samuel 18:1-4. Remember that? "And it came to pass, when he [David] had made an end of speaking unto Saul, the soul of Jonathan was knit (bound) with the soul of David and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. And Saul took him [David] that day and would let him go no more home to his father's house. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul. And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle" (King James). Wah Lawd! I don't know about you, but I feel a song coming on... "It's gettn' hot in here, so take off all your clothes, c'mo sing it with me, I am get-ting so hot, I wanna take my clothes off!" Okay, okay.... I'm back... Now, for integrity sake, I must elaborate on a couple of things. Aside from the fact that Jonathan was so moved by David's oratory skills that he had to get naked to cool off, he hands over to David, his clothing - robe, garments, sword, bow and his girdle - all of the accouterments of a soldier and a Prince. He gave up the family jewels ya'll! Everything that symbolized his status and his power as the heir to the throne, he handed over to David - the first time he laid eyes on him. Still fighting it huh? Wow! Okay, I love a good fight.

Riddle me this; What if this story was about a man and a woman? What if we had read in the text that a certain man, upon hearing/seeing a particular woman, was so moved by her that he fell in love with her at first sight, asked her to marry him and sealed the marriage with a kiss and his most prized possessions - the entire kingdom, would this be an issue? Would we even question that this was a "love at first sight" encounter? No, we would not! We'd probably hear about it every Valentine's Day weekend. It would be the text to preach from! Two love stories come to mind, the obvious of the two is Romeo and Juliet of course, but the other, though probably less familiar, is the story of King Edward VIII of the United Kingdom, who in 1936 abdicated the throne to marry an American divorcée, Wallis Simpson (Wallis was a woman by the way). This is precisely the "confusion" Saul was referring to. But what of this comment, "and unto the confusion of thy mother's nakedness" (1 Samuel 20:30b)? My goodness, what on earth could he possibly be talking about? I thought you'd never ask.

In the Hebrew scriptures, specifically, Leviticus, where we find the "Holiness Codes," whenever there is a reference to "nakedness," or the uncovering of a family member's "nakedness," it carries a sexual connotation that is improper or incestuous. When Saul chastised Jonathan by associating his behavior and affection for David to "the confusion of thy mother's nakedness," Saul was charging him with sexual impropriety that had brought shame upon the family. Still not convinced? Okay, stay with me. Because I know I recommended a reading of all of chapters 18-21, then I know you know that Jonathan and David had met in a field in secret prior to this dinner table showdown between Jonathan and his father Saul. They devised a plan to ascertain Saul's intentions toward David - was it all a misunderstanding or was Saul indeed intending to kill David? In that secret meeting in the field, they made another covenant between one another with God as their witness. They swore, one to the other, that their "seed," (offspring) would forever be cared for by the other should either of them die. Then they devised a method by which Jonathan could get the 411 and give David a heads up to escape before Saul could get to him. David even makes the suggestion that if he is to die, that it be by Jonathan's hand and not Saul's (1 Samuel 20). But hold on to your tail feathers because the best is yet to come. ;) ;)

The kitchen table brouhaha between Jonathan and his father, makes it painfully clear that Saul means to kill David. After Jonathan dodged his own bullet, I mean spear, he goes out with his armor-bearer and carries out the signs according to his and David's devised plan. He warns David that his father truly means to kill him. Afterwards, Jonathan releases his young armor-bearer, and sends him back into the city. Shhh... I have to whisper something in your ear, so you have to come a little closer for this... " As soon as the lad was gone, David arose out of the place toward the south, and fell on his face to the ground, and bowed himself three times; and they kissed one another, and wept one with another, until David exceeded" (1 Samuel 20:41). Wah Lawd! Hammercy on my soul! Do I really have to tell you what "exceeded" means? Really? Do I? Okay... The Hebrew word translated as "exceeded" is Gadal. It simply means "to grow, to enlarge, or become great; to promote, or to make powerful." Now I know that some of you will try to argue that what that means is that Jonathan, who is later killed in battle, diminishes in status and power and David who we know becomes King, "grows" in status, power and greatness... NOT... Saul, the King was still alive and, so was Jonathan, the heir to the throne, thus the reverence David pays to him every time they meet by bowing his head to the ground three times. No Dearheart, at this particular moment, in this particular context, the Hebrew translation of "exceeded," Gadal is .... Yes, a fully "grown," "enlarged," erection! Realizing this was the end of their love affair, Jonathan and David embraced, cried all over each other, kissed all over each other until they got all "swolt" up with and for one another and then had a "great" time before parting ways.... Shhh... Don't tell nobody I told you that.

If you read the rest of the story, you will learn that Jonathan and Saul both perish in battle and upon hearing of their deaths, David laments and sings for his lost love, "How are the mighty fallen in the midst of the battle! O Jonathan, thou wast slain in thine high places, I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan; very pleasant has thou been unto me: Thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women" (2 Samuel 1:25, 26). Umph... Whoop dere it is. Thank you King David for clearing that up for us. Oh yeah, one more thing - remember that promise/covenant made between Jonathan and David regarding their offspring? David honors it in 2 Samuel 9:1-13... Okay, that's it, I'm tired, and admittedly after this, I'm feeling a little frisky myself, so I'm gonna close this thing down.

But, if by this I have grieved you, forgive me and let not thine heart be troubled by what thy maidservant speaketh, for it is the Word of the Lord thou spake thence in thine hearing. In other words, don't be mad at me; it's in the book!

© Dorinda G. Henry, 2010

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

"The Love That Dare Not Speak Its Name"

Jonathan and David - Part I- An Introduction
1 Samuel 18:1-4; 19: 1-7; 20: 30, 41, 42; 2 Samuel 1:23, 26, 27

"When David had finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was bound to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. Saul took him [David] that day and would not let him return to his father's house. Then Jonathan made a covenant with David, because he loved him as his own soul. Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that he was wearing, and gave it to David, and his armor, and even his sword and his bow and his belt" (NRSV 1 Samuel 18: 1-4).

*I recommend that you read all of 1 Samuel, chapters 18-21... I'm just saying....

TWO LOVES
by
Lord Alfred Douglas, 1894

I dreamed I stood upon a little hill,
And at my feet there lay a ground, that seemed
Like a waste garden, flowering at its will
With buds and blossoms. There were pools that dreamed
Black and unruffled; there were white lilies
A few, and crocuses, and violets
Purple or pale, snake-like fritillaries
Scarce seen for the rank grass, and through green nets
Blue eyes of shy peryenche winked in the sun.
And there were curious flowers, before unknown,
Flowers that were stained with moonlight, or with shades
Of Nature's wilful moods; and here a one
That had drunk in the transitory tone
Of one brief moment in a sunset; blades
Of grass that in an hundred springs had been
Slowly but exquisitely nurtured by the stars,
And watered with the scented dew long cupped
In lilies, that for rays of sun had seen
Only God's glory, for never a sunrise mars
The luminous air of Heaven. Beyond, abrupt,
A grey stone wall, o'ergrown with velvet moss
Uprose; and gazing I stood long, all mazed
To see a place so strange, so sweet, so fair.
And as I stood and marvelled, lo! across
The garden came a youth; one hand he raised
To shield him from the sun, his wind-tossed hair
Was twined with flowers, and in his hand he bore
A purple bunch of bursting grapes, his eyes
Were clear as crystal, naked all was he,
White as the snow on pathless mountains frore,
Red were his lips as red wine-spilith that dyes
A marble floor, his brow chalcedony.
And he came near me, with his lips uncurled
And kind, and caught my hand and kissed my mouth,
And gave me grapes to eat, and said, 'Sweet friend,
Come I will show thee shadows of the world
And images of life. See from the South
Comes the pale pageant that hath never an end.'
And lo! within the garden of my dream
I saw two walking on a shining plain
Of golden light. The one did joyous seem
And fair and blooming, and a sweet refrain
Came from his lips; he sang of pretty maids
And joyous love of comely girl and boy,
His eyes were bright, and 'mid the dancing blades
Of golden grass his feet did trip for joy;
And in his hand he held an ivory lute
With strings of gold that were as maidens' hair,
And sang with voice as tuneful as a flute,
And round his neck three chains of roses were.
But he that was his comrade walked aside;
He was full sad and sweet, and his large eyes
Were strange with wondrous brightness, staring wide
With gazing; and he sighed with many sighs
That moved me, and his cheeks were wan and white
Like pallid lilies, and his lips were red
Like poppies, and his hands he clenched tight,
And yet again unclenched, and his head
Was wreathed with moon-flowers pale as lips of death.
A purple robe he wore, o'erwrought in gold
With the device of a great snake, whose breath
Was fiery flame: which when I did behold
I fell a-weeping, and I cried, 'Sweet youth,
Tell me why, sad and sighing, thou dost rove
These pleasant realms? I pray thee speak me sooth
What is thy name?' He said, 'My name is Love.'
Then straight the first did turn himself to me
And cried, 'He lieth, for his name is Shame,
But I am Love, and I was wont to be
Alone in this fair garden, till he came
Unasked by night; I am true Love, I fill
The hearts of boy and girl with mutual flame.'
Then sighing, said the other, 'Have thy will,
I am the Love that dare not speak its name.'

Wah Lawd! Yes indeed child! Ya might wanna get your King James out for this... See ya next week!
© Dorinda G. Henry, 2010

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

"You and Me, Us Never Part, Makidada"

Ruth

"You and me, Us never part
Makidada
You and me, Us have one heart
Makidada
Ain't no ocean, ain't no sea
Makidada
Keep my sistah way from me
Makidada"

I know, I know... But I promise, it is not my practice to use songs to introduce my blogs. Yes, admittedly, in recent postings, the spirit has moved in such a way that songs and the lyrics to those songs have been so perfectly complimentary to the sentiment being conveyed that I can't help but to incorporate them within the text. Remember, "All things work together for good for those who love God, who are called according to [her] purpose." And, it's further affirmation that the sacred is secular and the secular sacred. So, cut a sistah some slack would ya!

Alright, really, the book of RUTH is one of my favorite books in the bible. And yes, when I was trying to get my mind and thoughts together about this posting, I couldn't help but sing the little song that Celie and Nettie were singing in the movie, "The Color Purple." And, if any of you have read the book (which I suggest you do), or seen the movie, you know that a bond existed between those two little girls that "Nothing but death" would tear apart. Well, there is yet another bond between two women that was so strong that not even death would separate one from the other. Yes, I'm talking about the bond or rather, "relationship," between Ruth and Naomi. Whoa, whoa, whoa... Wait a minute! Hold on, now.... Geez Louise! Don't go getting your panties in a wad before you hear me out.

Listen, there are only two books in the entire bible where the central characters are women! No doubt, women play very prominent roles throughout the bible - somebody had to give birth to all those fascinating and powerful men! But nowhere else are the effects of women felt more profoundly than in the books of RUTH and later we'll see in ESTHER. But first, the "relationship," and yes, this time I do mean "relationship" between Ruth and Naomi, is one that deserves and demands our attention, respect and reverence. As one of the participants in my class so aptly pointed out, this is a story about love, loyalty and redemption - sorta. Let's take a looksee.

The narrative begins with a short background sketch. We learn that Naomi, a blessed woman with a husband, two sons and two daughters-in-law (Or'pah and Ruth) is adversely affected by famine in the land. She loses her husband and two sons (1:1-6). In an attempt to weather through the famine, Naomi sets out with her daughters-in-laws to the land of Judah, for she heard the "Lord had considered his people and given them food" (v. 6). On the way, she remembers herself, her plight and what lies ahead for young women with no husband and no male children. Selflessly she urges them to turn back and return to their mother's house for a chance to "find security, each of you in the house of your husband" (vv. 8b, 9a). The two women hold fast to their love for Naomi and initially refuse her request to turn back to the land of their people. But out of that love, Naomi persuades Or'pah, who relents, parts with a kiss and returns to the land of her people - Moab. But, "Ruth clung to her"(vv.10-14). Put a pin there... While I agree this story is about love, loyalty and redemption - kinda, I also believe, however, it is much deeper and much more complex and complicated than that. For what comes next is one of the most commonly incorporated and recited biblical verses in commitment ceremonies, and yes, "legal" marriages. For clarity's sake, I am compelled to invite you to reach for your King James Version of the bible as we venture to understand an important Hebrew translation of the word "clave." Okay, take the pin out.

Let's go back, "And they lifted up their voice and wept again: and Or'pah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clave unto her" (KJV 1: 14). The Hebrew word translated here as "clave," is identical to that used in the implied marriage between Adam and Eve, "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife; and they shall be one flesh" (KJV Genesis 2:24). Compare that to this eerily similar verse, "Intreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge; thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God: Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the Lord do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me" (KJV Ruth 1: 16b, 17). Hable por favor en inglés... "Where you go, I will go; where you lodge, I will lodge, your people shall be my people, and your God, my God. Where you die, I will die - there will I be buried. May the Lord do this and so to me and more as well, if even death parts me from you" (NRSV Ruth 1: 16b, 17)! Sounds like "one flesh" and "one heart" to me. But don't you think it is amazing that words spoken to seal a covenant - between a woman and a man before God, was actually spoken from one woman to another - in the bible! Is there a difference and if so what is it? Uh, uh... Nope, don't be lazy, come up with something else other than one is between opposite genders and the other is between the same gender. The words are translated the same, therefore, ought not the meaning of them be the same? Hmmmm? Two different concepts of "relationships," yet the same covenant? Caller you say what?

Okay, okay, moving right along. Ruth and Naomi continue on and arrive in Bethlehem at "the beginning of the barley harvest." There was a kinsman of Naomi's husband there in the land, a wealthy and well respected man, named Boaz. Ruth asks Naomi to allow her "to go to the field and glean among the ears of grain, behind someone in whose sight I might find favor" (2: 1,2). Now, I don't know about you, but I'm smiling bigger than the Cheshire cat in Alice and Wonderland. It is rather exciting to finally see women working together and consciously exploiting the culture and traditions of the day for their own benefit. Back to the story. Now it just so happens that Ruth gleaned in the field owned by none other than, Boaz. Surely I don't need to tell you that Ruth caught his eye, as was her intent. After inquiring and learning who she was, and who she did and/or did not belong to, Boaz says to her, "Do not go to glean in another field, or leave this one, but keep close to my young women. Keep your eyes on the field that is being reaped and follow behind them" (vv. 8, 9a). Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, SCORE! For her love, care and loyalty to Naomi, Boaz rewards her by allowing her to hang out, get some food (of which she saves a portion for Naomi), and gather about a bushel of barley. Although she lived with Naomi, she "gleaned" daily, keeping close to Boaz's women until the end of the harvest. The next move toward security for Ruth and redemption for Naomi comes by way of Naomi.

As a young woman, thinking I was smarter than Mama, I remember her saying to me, "Little girl, everything you are thinking about doing, I've already done!" Indeed Wisdom is a woman! It is with that wisdom that Naomi sets a plan into motion that will result in Ruth's security and her redemption. She knows Boaz and the other men of the village/neighborhood are going to the threshing floor to loosen the grain harvested. She also seems to be aware that the men would be eating and drinking as she instructs Ruth in the way of "getting her man" saying, "Now wash and anoint yourself, and put on your best clothes and go down to the threshing floor; but do not make yourself known to the man until he has finished eating and drinking. When he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do" (3: 1-4). In other words, "go get yourself together, put on some sweet smelling fragrance, the sexiest dress you have and wait until he's tired, full, and drunk and then, "service him," I mean "uncover his feet." Now if the only thing that happened next was Boaz catching a cold from his feet being exposed, I would be finished with this post, but it isn't. Instead, Boaz is so moved by Ruth's "virtuous" actions and deeds toward him throughout the entire night, that he swears "As the Lord lives," he will "act as next-of-kin," thereby "covering" her and, re-establishing an inheritance for Naomi (vv. 6-13). That must have been some really good service. Oh, I'm sorry, she must have really known how to "uncover his feet." Um hmph... Where you going? Don't go nowhere, I'm just getting warmed up!

After Ruth slips out before day break ---------- Just wanted to let that sit with ya for a moment, Boaz goes to the village gates and sits down to inquire of a kinsmen of Naomi that is closer in kin to her than he is about his desire, ability and willingness to fulfill the duties of a kinsmen to a previously deceased kinsmen, ensuring the continuation of the lineage of the deceased. The other kinsman of Naomi declined and thus Boaz was allowed to purchase the land and all that belonged to the deceased now belonged to him, including Ruth. Satisfying the customary practices of exchange and transactions of the day, Boaz took Ruth as his wife and she conceived a son. But wait, the women celebrate Naomi, shouting, "Blessed be the Lord, who has not left you this day without next-of-kin, (one who redeems) and may his name be renowned in Israel! He shall be to you a restorer of life and a nourisher of your old age; for your daughter-in-law who loves you, who is more to you than seven sons, has borne him." Naomi then takes the child to her bosom and nursed him. Then the women of the village/neighborhood gave the child a name saying, "A son (Obed) has been borne to Naomi" (Ch. 4). Wow! Really? And to think, out of this relationship of love, loyalty, redemption and um.... surrogacy, Naomi and Ruth become the Matriarch that brings forth Jesse, the father of David and eventually, the "one who redeems," the "restorer of life" - Jesus... Believe it or not!

"You and me, Us never part
Makidada
You and me, Us have one heart
Makidada
Ain't no ocean, ain't no sea
Makidada
Keep my sistah way from me
Makidada"
© Dorinda G. Henry, 2010

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

"Both Of Us Got Babies Now..."

Genesis 16; 21:1-21.

As an African American and a woman, without a doubt, the story of Sarai and Hagar rings particularly loud in my heart, mind and soul. That I am a relatively young woman, no, I have not personally felt the sting of a slave master's quirt or whip on my back, nor have I endured the pain of watching my children sold away from me, my husband beaten for trying to protect my honor or having my womanness taken against my will by the slave master. No, I have not endured first hand, the effects of chattel slavery. But I have experienced the byproduct of it. Yes, every time I had to greet Mama at the door after she returned from a long day cooking and cleaning for a white woman and her household. I have had to go to bed without the comfort of Mama's arms tenderly wrapped around me, as she did the children of white women - I'm sure humming some old Negro spiritual that lulled them to sleep. I have washed and caressed Mama's feet to relieve some of the aches and pains caused by standing too long serving guest at her white woman's house during a dinner party. And finally, I have had to stand by and feel my body swell with rage, watching and hearing white men, women and young white boys and young white girls call my Mama - the mother of 7 - "girl" or "gal."

So, no, I don't need the Pastor or some theologian to do amazing feats of hermeneutic gymnastics or exegetical analysis with or around the sacred text to find myself understanding the relational dynamics at play between Sarai and Hagar. The story of Sarai and Hagar is an all too familiar one. It is the story of two women in a struggle for security and power. It is the story of two different women belonging to the same man. It is the story of two mothers -- who give birth to two different babies, resulting in two separate nations. It is the story of two women, used, manipulated and abused within a male dominated society - God do we ever know that story!

Let's begin first with Sarai. She is the wife of Abram (the great Patriarch). She is a woman, without any rights or privileges and well into her twilight years. She is certainly past the time of childbearing for a woman, and, she has not even borne one male child. Back in chapter 15, when God said to Abram, "Look toward heaven and count the stars, if you are able to count them... So shall your descendants be," Sarai undoubtedly hears of it. Impatient, she decides to take matters into her own hands (Genesis 15:5b). She knows well and understands that a woman without a husband or a male child is nothing. Funny thing, that seems to be the prevailing sentiment of many women today - hmph - but I digress. Anyway, she knows that she is incredibly vulnerable should anything happen to Abram and she is left alone, a widow and childless. Therefore, in chapter 16, she reasons that maybe God's promise to Abram will be fulfilled through her "slave-girl," Hagar! Sounds reasonable enough, right? I mean after all, Sarai appears to have acquired Hagar as a part of the "dowry" Pharaoh paid to Abram when he was deceived by the clever couple in chapter 12. Remember that? Sarai was instructed by Abram, to um, "give up some @$S to get some ass(es)..." Please refer to, "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp." So, now Sarai has Hagar, the "slave-girl," and thus, her property. Thereby making any child conceived by Hagar the property of Sarai. Hence, God's promise to Abram fulfilled. "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."

Let's go now to Hagar, the Egyptian woman, given into servitude - to another woman! Good Lord! Whew... I cannot even begin to fathom the thought of that! But there she is, removed from her place of origin, her people, protection, her culture, and traditions. Her care and treatment is at the whim and mercy of another woman. Consequently, her body (which does not belong to her) is used and exploited for the benefit and gain of someone else - Sarai, her Mistress. Sound familiar? Of course! So, when you hear the adage, "Hurt people hurt people," believe it. Because now, Sarai does to Hagar what was done to her. She is now in a position of power and as such, she betrays the sanctity of sisterhood by "pimping" out her "slave-girl" to her husband urging him to, "Go in to my slave-girl; it may be that I shall obtain children through her." Quite naturally, Abram "listened to the voice of Sarai..." and "went in to Hagar, and she conceived" (16:1-4a). Umph! My, my, my... Do I dare continue? No... Yes! I must, I really and truly must. I feel like singing... "I will go, I shall go... [let's] see what the end is g'on be."

Ahhh, alas, "I's pregnant now!" Hagar, has suddenly experienced a rise in her stock. She, understandably, starts smelling herself to the dismay of Sarai. Consequently, Sarai reacts and upon receiving instruction from Abram to "do to her as you please," Sarai did just that and Hagar ran away from her... Here we go.... An angel of the Lord finds Hagar by a spring and inquires where she is coming from and where she is going. Hagar tells the angel all that has happened to her. The angel, knowing Hagar is with child, instructs her to return to her Mistress and to submit to her - but first, a promise. The angel of the Lord says to Hagar, "I will so greatly multiply your offspring that they cannot be counted for multitude" (vv. 5-10). She is then told she will bear a son, "and you shall call him Ishmael, for the Lord has given heed to your affliction" (v. 11).

Okay, I believe I have enticed you enough to go read the rest of the story for yourself. So, very quickly, let me wrap this up. In chapter 21:1-21, God has changed both Sarai and Abram's names to Sarah and Abraham respectively. As promised, God also blesses Sarah and she too conceives a son - Isaac! But one day, Sarah observes Ishmael playing with her son, Isaac. She gets angry and says to Abraham, "Cast out this slave woman with her son; for the son of this slave woman shall not inherit along with my son Isaac" (vv. 9, 10). I'm sorry, but I can't help but hear her saying that in this way, "Get your whore and that bastard child outta my house!" Now, I'm sure there was a better way to put that, but sometimes, some words take on an entirely deeper and stronger meaning when said just the right way, with just the right inflection! So forgive me if I stepped out of bounds. I'll bet you got the picture though... And, I know you know Abraham did what Sarah told him to do. Sure, of course he was grieved, but God told him to do as Sarah had instructed him to do. And, to ease Abraham's anguish, God lets him in on a little secret S/HE promised to Hagar, "As for the son of the slave woman, I will make a nation of him also, because he is your offspring" (v. 13).

Ohhh wee... Lawd Hammercy! Umph, umph, umph... What's that I hear off in the distance? Butterfly McQueen, shouting from the heavens, "I don't know nuff'n bout birth'n no baby Miss Scarlett!" I hear ya loud and clear. Rest Mama - Rest easy.
© Dorinda G. Henry, 2010

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

"A Mistress and her Slave"

"El-roi!"

"Oh Freedom! Oh freedom! Oh freedom over me.
And before I be a slave, I'll be buried in my grave;
And go home to my Lord and be free.
No mo' moan'n, no mo' weeping.
There'll be sing'n,
There'll be shout'n,
There'll be pray'n.
And before I be a slave, I'll be buried in my grave;
And go home to my Lord and be free."

Oh, that I was a child again. I remember getting ready for Sunday school and church every Sunday morning - hated it! You see, my grandmother and God were best friends. So we had to go to church every Sunday to spend time with baby Jesus, because that's when God would let all the other miscreants and misfits spend time with our Lord and Saviour - Jesus Christ. I even remember wondering about Jesus' whole name. I pondered - as inquisitive little girls often do - if Jesus' first name is Jesus and his last name is Christ, then what is his middle name? I reasoned, I have a middle name, so what was Jesus Christ's middle name? I spent hours upon hours of prepubescent exploration trying to come up with a name as special and as wonderful as "Jesus" and "Christ." I couldn't come up with one name! Tired and weary, I finally asked, "What is Jesus' middle name?" The answer? Yep, you guessed it, "Jesus doesn't have a middle name!" And to support that argument, I was informed that Mama didn't have a middle name either! OH-MY-GOD! My grandmother and God really were best friends - they even named their children in the same way! WOW! Needless to say, Mama didn't have much trouble out of me after that - well not until those crazy teenage years.

Okay, okay, seriously. I often reminisce about the songs we used to sing in church - those old Negro spirituals that resonated so profoundly within me that I knew I could feel the earth shake from the joy of the ancestors upon hearing them. We don't sing those songs anymore - not the way we used to sing them. I believe a lot is lost as a result. But the one above speaks particularly to the dilemma and power dynamics at play between two women whose lives converged by acts of manipulation and exploitation of men.

Much happens to bring these women together and much happens afterwards. Two different women, with very different backgrounds, cultures, traditions and faith systems. Hagar, the slave girl who knows she's a slave and Sarai, the special little "Misses" who, in many ways, is also a slave, interact with one another and others around them to create a relationship narrative of biblical proportion. Both are blessed with a male child - fathered by the same man. Two different babies, two different nations - two different faiths... "Round and round it goes, where it stops, nobody knows."

Oh, I'm a child no more, and now I can't wait to get to church for bible study on Sunday! Who'da thunk it!

© Dorinda G. Henry, 2010

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

"Brand New Key"

Relationships in the Bible

In 1971, Melanie Safka wrote and sang the song, "Brand New Key." It was a very cute, kinda folksy tune that I've remembered since my childhood. And without fail, when being lighthearted about my own attraction to someone or a friend's attraction to someone else, I always sing the refrain of the song which goes like this:

"I've got a brand new pair of roller skates, you've got a brand new key.

I think that we should get together and try them on to see.

I been lookin' around awhile, you got something for me.

Oh, I got a brand new pair of roller skates, you got a brand new key..."

If you are too young to remember the tune, try to find it and listen to it. I believe you too, like me, will find it quite enjoyable and fitting when "relationships" is the topic of the hour. And that brings me to this particular blog.

The next bible study series will explore some of the most intriguing relationships in the bible. These relationships - though some are - are not always intimate or romantic, but have and will leave indelible imprints on our lives. To date (as I am open to suggestions), the following will be discussed over the course of seven weeks:

Sarah and Hagar

Ruth and Naomi
David and Jonathan

Vashti and Esther

David and Bathsheba

Jesus and Mary of Magdala - aka Mary Magdalene

Jesus and the Beloved Disciple

Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010

Time: 9:30am

Location: Sanctuary at Tabernacle Baptist Church, 475 Boulevard NE, Atlanta, GA 30308

Phone: (404) 876-3777

*Please bring a bible - preferably the New Revised Standard Version (I also like the King James Version as a compliment).

I hope to see you all on Sunday!

THEOLOGIA HABITUS EST!

Theology is a way of life